Jean Ferré (ARISEM) : "A patent free software industry is necessary
for innovation"
ARISEM is a 3 years old Paris based software company specialised in
information and knowledge management server systems. ARISEM created one
of the first meta-searcher on the Web : DigOut4U (1997 IDG Internet Innovation
award)
We strongly believe at ARISEM that software just like ideas should not
be patentable. If this became the rule, it would become very difficult
for company like ours to emerge. How could we generate innovation if every
idea, every algorithm, every implementation in the code needed to
be checked as being patent-free. How could we develop ourselves if every
week or so we needed to apply for a patent. Software patents are not a
necessity to protect innovation in the software industry (branding, expertise,
fast development and innovation make this much better), software patents
are more a mean to create an artificial entrance barrier.
For ARISEM, a patent free software industry is necessary for innovation
to stay possible for small and medium organisations. Moreover, it seems
obvious to us that patent enforcement would slow down the expansion and
development of information technologies. This would be damageable for humanity
as a whole and for our industry.
We - in the software industry - work hard to create a better world for
people that will be able to share ideas, information and knowledge. We
at ARISEM believe that software patent enforcement would ruin all this
and only create additional lines of profit for law firms.
Jean Ferré - CEO
ARISEM
http://www.arisem.com
Jean Ferré (ARISEM) : "Le brevet, c'est un peu la mort de l'innovation
spontanée"
Le sentiment très fort d'ARISEM est que le logiciel n'est pas brevetable,
comme les idées. Et qu'une politique de brevets favorise les entreprises
de grande taille capables de produire un grand nombre de brevets et de
les défendre ensuite.
Pour une start-up (nous sommes 15 personnes et autofinancés),
le brevet est cher et nous développons beaucoup trop d'idées
pour toutes les breveter. Si le brevet était gratuit (subventionné
totalement par Bruxelles), ce serait mieux. Reste néanmoins le fait
que ce qui coûte cher est de faire appliquer et respecter un brevet,
reste aussi que ce serait ingérable de devoir vérifier avant
chaque production d'un algorithme ou d'un bout de code s'il faut payer
des royalties à quelqu'un qui est passé par là avant.
Le brevet, c'est un peu la mort de l'innovation spontanée telle
que nous la pratiquons à ARISEM en tous cas. ARISEM souhaite que
sur ce point le modèle américain ne soit pas suivi par la
Commission.
Jean Ferré - Président Directeur Général
ARISEM
http://www.arisem.com
(translation by JP. Smets)
Jean Ferré (ARISEM) : "Software Patents mean the death
of spontaneous innovation"
Wer strongly believe at ARISEM that software, just like ideas,
should not be patentable. Patents tend to promote big companies which can
file many patents and enforce them.
For a start-up company like us, with 15 employess and
self-finances, patents are expensive and we create much to many ideas to
patent them all. If patents were free or totally subsidised by European
Commission, il would be more reasonable. Still, what is really expensive
is to enforce a patent. It is also impossible to manage a development process
in which one has to check for each algorithm used in software whether royalties
should be paid to someone else.
Patents are like the death of spontaneous innovation just
as we handle it at ARISEM. ARISEM hopes, for the precise point of software
patentability, that the European Commission will not try to imitate the
American model.
Jean Ferré - CEO
ARISEM
http://www.arisem.com
|